{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":false},"comments":[{"id":"66928508","dateCreated":"1396642524","smartDate":"Apr 4, 2014","userCreated":{"username":"MrCNewman","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/MrCNewman","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/pic\/1369498615\/MrCNewman-lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/bshtok.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/66928508"},"dateDigested":1531983324,"commentId":"498836572_3","orphaned":false,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"comment","title":"Comment: This is a good start that grapples wi...","description":"This is a good start that grapples with the quote","rangeActions":[{"name":"Comment added","rangeText":"This quote from Arnold Bennett consists of two parts, which are related to each other. Firstly, I will look at the first statement: according to him there is a relationship between knowledge and emotion. He states that there can be no knowledge without emotion; so if there are no emotions, there is no knowledge. But which type of knowledge does he mean? It isn't explained in his thesis; it could be knowledge you have learned from your experiences or knowledge which you have \u201ca priori.\u201d Arnold Bennet doesn't say if you can gain knowledge with or without emotion; so the first part of his statement can also be expressed: \u201cknowledge can't be gained without emotion\u2026\u201d The second part of his statement isn't clear if Arnold Bennett means the common knowledge or the individual knowledge; latter means if you individualize the knowledge, you make it \u201cours.\u201d In my following essay I am going to explore if there can be knowledge without emotion and how it can help or hinder knowledge to become \u201cours\u201d. Are we able to make decisions without our emotions?